Wiki improvements

[badidea]

@fxm:
Is this statement on https://www.freebasic.net/wiki/TutIntroArrays correct?
"Static arrays, the arrays described above, are kept on the heap, but dynamic arrays are allocated from the computer's pool of memory. The compiler dynamically allocates memory for the array based on the requested dimensions of the array."

I thought incorrect, but I may have misunderstood the 'heap'.

[fxm]

In the context of this sentence, I think that 'static arrays' means 'fixed-length arrays' and therefore that this beginning of the sentence is wrong.
I simply propose to delete the beginning of the sentence:

Dynamic arrays are allocated from the computer's pool of memory. The compiler dynamically allocates memory for the array based on the requested dimensions of the array.

or correct it:

Static (fixed-length) arrays, the arrays described above, are kept either in static storage or on the program stack, but dynamic arrays are allocated from the computer's pool of memory. The compiler dynamically allocates memory for the array based on the requested dimensions of the array.

[badidea]

The first (with less information) seems better to me.
In both suggestions the reference to heap is gone, but in the second 'static storage or program stack' is now mentioned which is confusing if we don't explain the difference between these 2 concepts.
Maybe add a link to https://www.freebasic.net/wiki/ProPgDynamicMemory where this is better explained?

[fxm]

Retained sentence:

Dynamic arrays are allocated from the computer's pool of memory called heap. The compiler dynamically allocates memory for the array based on the requested dimensions of the array.

Documentation updated:
TutIntroArrays → fxm [rewording]

[Quin]

Hello,
I'm a completely blind FreeBASIC programmer, and I prefer reading the documentation in the compiled CHM format. However, when I do this, there are no spaces between keywords, so something like Dim Test As String is read as DimTestAsString by my screen reader, and when I go character-by-character there are no spaces like there would be in the compiled code. Is it possible for this to be fixed?
You can notice this behavior yourself by selecting the text with shift+arrow keys and copying it into notepad.
Thanks!

[fxm]

Maybe a problem with just Linux?

[RetardedAndProud]

Hello,
I'm a completely blind FreeBASIC programmer, and I prefer reading the documentation in the compiled CHM format. However, when I do this, there are no spaces between keywords, so something like Dim Test As String is read as DimTestAsString by my screen reader, and when I go character-by-character there are no spaces like there would be in the compiled code. Is it possible for this to be fixed?
You can notice this behavior yourself by selecting the text with shift+arrow keys and copying it into notepad.
Thanks!

Maybe you could provide more information in your post.
OS?
Version?
Architecture?
How you are currently viewing it i.e. OS built-in or third party software?
and maybe a reference to the page you are referring to.

Maybe a problem with just Linux?

Using Debian 11 (Bullseye):
I can view the CHM manual perfectly using either xChm (Debian repo package) or via wine hh.exe <.chm file>

[Quin]

Sorry, I should've been more specific. I'm on Windows, using the free NVDA screen reader from nvaccess.org, reading the provided CHM file in Microsoft's built-in CHM viewer. I imagine it looks fine visually, my assumption is it's either some weird unicode character or some odd CSS styling inside code blocks.
Thanks!

[RetardedAndProud]

Sorry, I should've been more specific. I'm on Windows, using the free NVDA screen reader from nvaccess.org, reading the provided CHM file in Microsoft's built-in CHM viewer. I imagine it looks fine visually, my assumption is it's either some weird unicode character or some odd CSS styling inside code blocks.
Thanks!

No problem.

As I'm not a Windows user (not since XP) I'm really not able to assist further, maybe a Windows guru will be along soon?

Good luck.